Inshore Craft 3 – the hobble boat

Bude Pilot 2

Following my post on the Bude Hobble Boat (above, in later years, waiting to guide the Ceres which is entering Bude under her own steam), I thought it would be useful for those who like more detail to see how much work they had to do.

As a demonstration of the numbers of Vessels involved, the following is a list of the Shipping movements for the month of May 1838, taken at random from my Great Grandfather’s notes. This date is before the meetings referred to in the previous post.

May 1          Dasher                        Hatherly         11/-

       ” ”            Kitty                            Pickard             8/9

      ” 3            Rising Sun                 Lewis              10/6

      ” 6            Lord Porchester     Davey            11/9

      ” 7            Dasher                        Hatherly        11/-

      ” ”              Kitty                           Pickard          8/9

     ” 9              Rebecca                    Morton          18/-

      ” ”               Friends                     Whitefield      8/9

      ” ”               Sisters                        Cook               12/9

     ” ”                Ceres                          Greenaway    15/-

    ” 10             Lion                             Kivell              18/-

      ” ”               Sir R.Vivyan             Mill                  11/-

     ” 11             Maria                          Metherall       13/-

      ” 12            Betsy                          Penzance       10/9

       ” ”             Speedwell                 Pengelly         16/6

       ” ”             Sisters                        Cook                12/9

     ” 13           Margaret                    Fish                   6/9

     ” 14            Friends                      Whitefield      8/9

      ” ”               Kitty                            Pickard            8/9

     ” ”                Dasher                        Hatherly         12/6

     ” ”                Sprightly                   Marshall          14/3

     ” 16            Eliza                  from Newquay        14/3

     ” 18             Sir R.Vivyan            Mill                   10/6

       ” ”               Sisters                        Cook                 12/9

     ” 19              Rising Sun               Lewis               11/-

        ” ”              Victoria                     Foun(?)          15/0

      ” 21              Mary              from Plymouth   £1/0/0

      ” 25              Friends                      Whitefield      8/9

        ” ”               Sisters                         Cook               13/-

        ” 26          Sir R.Vivyan              Mill                 11/-

       ” ”               Kitty                             Pickard         8/9

       ” ”               Dasher                        Hatherly       12/6

       ” ”              Lord Porchester      Davey            11/9

       ” ”              Rebecca                      Morton          18/-

       ” 28           Victoria                      Foun(?)          15/-

You can see that the Dasher lived up to her name and entered (and left Bude) twice during the month. It would be interesting know where she went and what she brought back with her.

There were 18 vessels altogether. The Ceres I have talked about elsewhere and I will be posting more about her shortly. The Hobble fees are an indication of the relative sizes of the ships, the Mary from Plymouth being the largest vessel to enter the canal that month.

The Hobble Boat worked all year round. Between 24th December and 29th December 1836, they handled no less than eight vessels.

Bude Canal

And, of course, the coming of the railway brought an end to this means of trading along the coast, and the end to a way of life.

This is one of a number of posts on the Ketch “Ceres” – in this case regarding pilotage. They have been presented in a random order as and when I have found, or been given, new material. They represent steps in a personal quest to find out more about one branch of my family.

If you are interested in maritime history or would like to read more, please use the Search facility at the top right hand side of this page (‘Ceres’). If this is not available on your current screen, then click on ‘Bill’s Boat Blog’ – (or the title of this entry, then ‘Bill’s Boat Blog’), to be taken to the correct page.

Inshore Craft 2 – the hobble boat

Hobble Boat

 The Bude Hobble Boat.

The picture shows a beamy rowing boat moored in Bude sea lock. It has three thwarts (rowing seats) and a stern seat. The gunwales (sides) are raised to cope with big seas and, instead of rowlocks, the oars fit into these gunwales. Of the three thwarts, the forward and aft ones have places for oars on the port side, the middle thwart has a place on the starboard side and there is one on the starboard side just forward of the stern seat. There is also a position in the stern for a steering oar, (being used in the picture below).  There are  four oars in the boat. The bows have some form of strengthening, presumably for towing and/or pushing.

Hobble Boat being towed

The following is taken from my grandfather’s notes and refers to meetings held in 1839 regarding the Bude Hobble Boat, which supplied a pilot and, sometimes tow, to sailing vessels entering Bude in the days before engines. The notes seak for themselves. The accompanying photographs were taken much later, after engines had been installed. Entering Bude Haven under power was a totally different procedure to entering under sail.

 

At a meeting of the proprietors of the Bude Pilot Boat held at the Bude Inn on the 13th January 1839:

1st: George Hambly’s appointment as master of the Boat, which was made some time since, is this day confirmed.

2ndly: The Master is fully empowered to appoint his own Crew (subject only to the approbations of the Owners of the Boat) and he is hereby authorized to discharge any man who neglects his duty.

3rdly: It is imperative upon the Master to enforce the fines for non-attendance, neglect of orders or drunkenness, and he is requested to keep an account of the dates and the names of parties and to deliver the same to the Owners of the Boat with the half yearly accounts. The amount of the fine to be one shilling and sixpence.

4thly: Each man of the Crew is in turn to keep a good and sufficient look out at tide time, the arrangements to be under the direction of the Master.

The subject of the amount of Pilotage and the necessity of charging recall* Hobbles in particular cases having been discussed, it is resolved that to give the Master sufficient time for preparing a list of the ships with old and new admeasurements of each, that this meeting be adjourned to Monday the 7th instant.

Signed: John Hockin, J.S.James, Davey (pps J.T.Davey)

Hobble Boat waiting

At the Adjourned Meeting held at the Bude Inn on Monday Jany 7th (sic) 1839:

Resolved that the Pilotage on vessels entering Bude be on the following scale according to the New Register.

Tonnage below 20 tons                                     5 3/4 (pence) per ton

                ditto         25 tons `                                   5 1/2 (pence) per ton

               ditto         30 tons                                       5 1/4 (pence) per ton

               ditto           35 tons                                     5 per (pence) per ton

              ditto           40 tons                                      4 3/4 (pence) per ton

              ditto           45 tons (and all above)  4 1/2 (pence) per ton

The foregoing scale is for the Pilotage In and Out and to be paid before the Vessel enters the Sea Locks on her departure.

In case a Vessel should not get into the Lock (on) the tide she enters the Harbour, the Hovellers are bound to attend two extra tides if necessary but if further attendance still should be required, the Vessel will be subject to a recall* Hobble of One Shilling and Sixpence.

Any Vessel going out of the Locks and not putting to sea the same tide to be the subject of a recall* Hobble of 1/6 for every tide the Hobblers may be required before she leaves the Port.

Signed: John Hockin, Wm Davey, J.S.James, Daniel Lane

* the handwriting makes this word difficult to decipher, and I am not convinced it is the correct one but I believe it expresses the correct meaning.

Hobble Boat

For the background to the Inshore Craft series click here.

This is one of a number of posts on the Ketch “Ceres” – in this case regarding pilotage. They have been presented in a random order as and when I have found, or been given, new material. They represent steps in a personal quest to find out more about one branch of my family.

If you are interested in maritime history or would like to read more, please use the Search facility at the top right hand side of this page (‘Ceres’). If this is not available on your current screen, then click on ‘Bill’s Boat Blog’ – (or the title of this entry, then ‘Bill’s Boat Blog’), to be taken to the correct page.

Inshore Craft 1

“We treat the past as a foreign country, when, in reality, it was occupied by the same people as us.”

I’ve forgotten who said that but I was reminded of it when I saw that Edgar March’s “Inshore Craft of Britain: In the Days of Sail and Oar” has just been republished.

It was first published in 1970, and covers small working boats of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries. Reading it, I was fascinated that an island as small Britain should have developed so many different shaped boats to perform more or less the same thing. Each locality had grown a different tradition. These working boats were, in effect, visual versions of regional accents. Thirty five years later, I am still fascinated.

Three reasons for liking this book:

1. For the boats themselves – as complex objects, with lines and detail, some more elegant than others, but all with a functional beauty that fitted their surroundings.

2. They were true examples of the the concept of ‘form following function’, made more substantial in that they were the livelihood of their owners and crew. Here were small boats constructed in local yards round the coastline of a small island. They varied in shape, in design and in size, not just from region to region but often from harbour to harbour, the only limitation being in the wood and materials used in their construction.

On the face of it, looking back from our mass-produced, communication-efficient world, it can be difficult to understand why this Falmouth Workboat, photographed off Polruan in Cornwall 

Falmouth Quay Punt

should differ so much from this Coble, photographed at Seahouses in Northumberland.

sea 062

After all, they were built for more or less the same purpose.

In fact, the answer isn’t so difficult. Take one island, facing north, south, east and west; take tides, currents, prevailing winds; take a long, varied coastline, some stretches steep and rugged, some shallow with sand and mud, some exposed to the weather, some with large safe deep harbours, some with just a rock or two for shelter. Add a function – fishing, trade, piloting, transport.

Even today, these factors would make a difference to shape and form, but think what centuries of experience of local conditions would do. Think about the materials that would be available in one part of the country that weren’t in another. Think about the traditions that would have grown up around a particular coastline. And to really understand what it was like, you need to take one other factor into account:

3. The owners and crew who sailed in them. They represented the way of life of countless small communities. This was a world where experience counted, where fathers passed their skills onto their sons and, less so in those days, their daughters. Here were local communities, not necessarily isolated from one another but certainly separated, who developed their own craft specifically for the coastal conditions in their area.

No different from us today – they faced the problems of the time and had to solve them. They laughed like us, they cried like us, they succeeded, they failed, they loved, they hated – just like us. They knew what hard work meant. Some did it well, some badly, a few brilliantly. Some were successful financially and went on to do more, some were less so. But their knowledge, skills and attitudes came from doing, from experiencing first-hand. It took longer to gain them, but the best results lasted as long, if not longer, than ours will today. Those hard-won abilities created individuals in a world that needed individuals.

There is one major difference between are ancestors and us today. We have access to more knowledge and more skills, and at a far younger age, than those who came before us could possibly imagine in their wildest dreams – (think Google, endless courses, books, journals and DVDs). But, despite this, our basic ability to absorb and use our new-found knowledge has not grown in line with our sources. In the end, we learn best by doing too – and it still takes time. All the rest of the stuff that comes our way is ‘on approval’ – and we are becoming increasingly swamped by it, struggling to be individuals in a sea of often irrelevant information.

So what’s your point, Bill?

I don’t have a romantic view of the past but I do have a respect for those who learn from experience – and I don’t care whether they were born in 2007 or 1007. (At this point, it would be easy to bang on about our not learning the lessons of the past, but that’s for others to do).

What I would like to do is to stay with boats and to use the concepts above – a) boats themselves, b) the fact of their form following their function, and c) the crews who sail in them, and, as I travel around the coasts not just of the UK but further afield, record, if I can, examples of craft that are being used today that represent this long line of experience. No doubt, some will exhibit a high quality of craftsmanship, some less so. But it isn’t the quality I want to pick out here. What interests me are the solutions to maritime problems that work in particular circumstances. Like this small fishing boat moored in Trikeri on the Pelion Peninsular, on the Aegean shores of Greece.

DSC00628

I do not pretend to be an expert. Inevitably, my efforts will be random observations and certainly not comprehensive. But, this is not an academic study, it is a record of small pleasures, pleasures I believe I share with many other people.

It is also a record of concern, a concern I also share with many others. Times are changing so fast that much hard-won, long-term experience is being sacrificed in the name of easily-found, short-term expediency. We badly need to hang on to some of that experience.

So, my entries to this blog over the next year or so will include an ‘Inshore Craft’ series of images. I hope they will be of interest to you. Please feel free to add your own if you wish.